ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)

For citation:

Poizner B. N. Being of a formation as the object of cognition. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 1994, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 100-110. DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-1994-2-3-100-110

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon 1994no3-4p100.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
History of Nonlinear Dynamics. Personalia
Article type: 
Personalia
UDC: 
530.1
DOI: 
10.18500/0869-6632-1994-2-3-100-110

Being of a formation as the object of cognition

Autors: 
Poizner Boris Nikolaevich, National Research Tomsk State University
Abstract: 

The ways of synergetics influence not only on progress of exact sciences but on the whole culture are discussed. It is suggested to work out the history of synergetics development in context of eschatology of knowledge (the author’s term). 
The new conceptions which can be considered as anticipations of synergetics or its modern parallels: from С. Leibniz, D. Diderot, teaching on God—humanity, P. Florensky to H. Driesch, A. Bogdanov, D. Panin — are enumerated. Some new names of synergetics are suggested in order to express the object of its cognition more correctly. The features of modem self—organization process of knowledge are exposed: 1) due to synergetics the integration of sciences banded with common character of subject (not only object of investigation) takes place; 2) epistemological standard (author’s term) worked out by synergetics is accepted by the increasing numbers of science schools; 3) synergetics forms a new type of scientist. 
In the author’s opinion synergetics is a leader in development of interhumanism (G.Bachelard’s term) and it’s worthwhile to verify S. Cole’s hypothesis about the hierarchy of the sciences is applied to synergetics and boundary sciences. ‘ Incorrect application of synergetic approach (especially by the specialists of the humanities) causes alarm because of discreditation of synergetics, which transforms into scientific monomyth.

Key words: 
-
Reference: 
  1. Bachelard G. Scientific vocation and soul of man. In: New Rationalism. М.: Progress; 1987. P. 328-346.
  2. Scheler М. Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Reichl; 1928. 114 p. (in German)
  3. Fukuyama F. The end of the history. Questions of Philosophy. 1990;3:134-147. Fukuyama F. States can disintegrate, but democracy can grow up. Country and the World. 1992;2:10-12.
  4. Eremenko АМ.Multidimensionality of history. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. 1991;12:42-60.
  5. Kissel МА. Philosophical synthesis of A.N. Whitehead. In: Whitehead A. Selected Works on Philosophy. M., 1990. P. 3-55.
  6. Yablonskii АI. Mathematical Models in the Development of Science. М.: Nauka; 1985. 351 p.
  7. Burger M, Bujdoso E. Oscillating chemical reactions as an example of the development of a subfield of science. In: Field RJ, Burger M, editors. Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems. N.Y.: Wiley; 1985. P. 565–604.
  8. Poizner BN. Kinetic model of interaction of two traditions. Tomsk: Tomsk State University; 1988. 17 p. Archived in Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences 13.07.88, No. 378.
  9. Chernenko IV. The theory of disasters and the fate of Russia. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. 1991;11:11-31.
  10. Saenko YuI. Bifurcation point of sociology, search for prospects. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. 1991;12:61.
  11. Danilov YuA, Kadomtsev BB. What is synergy? In: Nonlinear Waves: Self-Organisation. M.; 1983. P. 5.
  12. Haken H. Advanced Synergetics. Instability Hierarchies of Self-Organizing Systems and Devices. Berlin: Springer; 1983. 356 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45553-7.
  13. Veisman АD. Greek-Russian dictionary: reprint 1899 y. edition. М., 1991. 1370 p.
  14. Khoruzhii SS. Khomyakov and the principle of unity. Here and Now. 1992;2:68-85. Khoruzhii SS. Isychasm, God-humanity, noogenesis and a little about our society. Beginnings. 1992;2:4-13.
  15. Leibniz GW. Монадология. In: Лейбниц Г.В. Соч. в 4-хтт. Т. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1898. 437 p.
  16. Wartofsky МW. Diderot and the development of materialistic monism. In: Models. Representation and Scientific Understanding. М.; 1988. P. 324-375.
  17. Hagemeister M, Kauchtschischwii N. P.A. Florensky and the Culture of his Time. Blaue Horner; 1995. 526 p.
  18. Novik IB, Uemov АI. A.A. Bogdanov. “Tectology. General organisational science”. The Questions of the Philosophy. 1990;11:172-174.
  19. Tarasenko С. Dmitry Panin is a religious philosopher and architect of modern science. Russian thought (Paris). 1992. 13 November. P. 13.
  20. Muchnik G. Order and chaos. Science and Life. 1988;3:70-76.
  21. Prigogine I. Prospects for complexity research. In: Systems Research: Methodological Issues. Yearbook 1986. М.; 1987. P. 45.
  22. Arshinov VN, Svirskii YaI. From meaning reading to meaning generation. The Questions of the Philosophy. 1992;2:145-152.
  23. Zakharova ZA, Poizner BN.  Methodological analytics and genesis of modern chemical knowledge. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1992;47(1):56-60.
  24. Prigogine I. Philosophy of instability. The Questions of the Philosophy. 1991;6:46-52. Knyazeva EN, Prigogine I. In Search of a New Worldview: I. Prigogine, Е. Rerikh and N. Rerikh. М.:Znanie; 1991. 62 p.
  25. Dobronravova IS. Non-linear thinking. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. 1991;6:48.
  26. Belyi А. Ways of culture. The Questions of the Philosophy. 1990;11:91-94.
  27. Cole S. The Hierarchy of the Sciences? American Journal of Sociology. 1983;89(1):111–139. DOI: 10.1086/227835
  28. Poyzner BN. Chaos, order, time in ancient world pictures. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics. 1993;1(3—4):97-109.
  29. Kakhovskii L. Reasing chaos. Chemistry and Life. 1992;8:34.
  30. Silkin B. Mozart would have laughed. Chemistry and Life. 1992;2:97-98.
  31. Gaponov-Grekhov АV, Rabinovich МI.About chaos and order. In: Science and Humanity, 1991: International Yearbook. M.; 1991. P. 216.
  32. Vikhalemm RА, Nyapinen АYa. Principles of historicism in the scientific program of I. Prigozhina. University of Tartu’s Academic Notes. 1987;786:24-38.
  33. Atsyukovskii VА. Materialism and Relativism. Criticism of the Methodology of Modern Physics. М.: Energoizdat; 1992. 192 p.
  34. Romm M. Index: Almanack on Materials of Handwritten Journals. M.: Efa; 1990. 364 p.
  35. Dzhangirov KE, Tyurin AV. White square - II: Miniatures. М.: Sovetskii Pisatel; 1992. 157 p.

PS

  1. 1Р. Markova LА. The End of the Century is the End of Science? М.: Nauka; 1992. 132 p.
  2. 2Р. Knyazeva ЕN, Kurdyumov SP. Synergy as a new worldview: dialogue with I. Prigozhin. Questions of Philosophy. 1992;12:3-20. Knyazeva ЕN, Kurdyumov SP. Intuition as self-building. Questions of Philosophy. 1994;2:110-122.
  3. 3P. Kuzmin МV. Complex modelling. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. 1992;12:8.
  4. 4Р. Sokuler ZA. The debate about determinism in French philosophical literature. Questions of Philosophy. 1993;2:140-149.
  5. 5P. Progogine I, Stengers I. Time, Chaos and Quantum. M.: URSS; 2003. 239 p.
  6. 6Р.      Gloy К. The problem of the last justification of dynamic systems. Questions of Philosophy. 1994;3:94.
  7. 7P. Chaikovskii YuV. On the general theory of evolution. Path. 1993;4:101—141. Chaikovskii YuV. Cognitive models, pluralism and survival. Path. 1992;1:62-108.
  8. 8Р. Kompanichenko VN. Self-organisation of the individual is the way to the flourishing of mankind. Khabarovsk; 1994. 51 p.
  9. 9P. Levin ID. Essays. Vol. 1. М.: Radiks; 1994. 402 p.
Received: 
06.01.1993
Accepted: 
25.07.1994
Published: 
24.07.1994
  • 1655 reads