ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)

For citation:

Aristov V. V., Kubryak O. В., Stepanyan I. V. Calculation of the cyclic characteristics of the electroencephalogram for investigation of the electrical activity of the brain. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2023, vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 469-483. DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-003051, EDN: ZTBPSQ

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon and_2023-4_6aristov_et_al_469-483.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Full text PDF(En):
PDF icon and_2023_4_aristov_eng.pdf
(downloads: 6)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Nonlinear Dynamics and Neuroscience
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
51-76, 57.087.23
DOI: 
10.18500/0869-6632-003051
EDN: 
ZTBPSQ

Calculation of the cyclic characteristics of the electroencephalogram for investigation of the electrical activity of the brain

Autors: 
Aristov Vladimir V, Федеральный исследовательский центр «Информатика и управление» РАН
Kubryak Oleg Витальевич, Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI)
Stepanyan Ivan V., Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of RAS
Abstract: 

The purpose of the study is experimental verification of the proposed EEG analysis method based on the construction of a connectivity graph of the analyzed signal, in which the amplitudes are displayed by vertices, and their relative position relative to each other by arcs. The display of the EEG signal in the graph structure causes the appearance of cyclic structures with the possibility of calculating their numerical characteristics.

As a result of the study, criteria for initialization of the initial conditions of the counting algorithm have been developed. The following parameters were calculated: the number of cycles and the Euler number in the EEG recording. Coil representations of graphs are given. The proposed algorithm has a scaling parameter, the choice of which affects the final results. The second free parameter of the proposed algorithm is the degree of artificial signal coarsening. Variants of the algorithm application for multichannel EEG signals with multichannel signal processing by channel-by-channel detection of semantic units and construction of a generalized semantic connectivity graph are considered. An example of an analyzed multichannel EEG signal, which was pre-processed with reduction of all amplitudes to natural numbers in accordance with the calculated characteristics, is given. An example of an EEG of a subject with closed eyes during quiet wakefulness and an EEG of a subject with open eyes is given.

In Conclusion, it is shown that the final indicators can vary significantly (from zero to tens of thousands or more) depending on the particular derivation of the EEG channel. Analysis of the cyclic structures of the electroencephalogram seems to be a potential way to assess various human states due to the possibility of distinguishing them using the proposed method. The study has a limited, pilot character

Key words: 
electroencephalography
electroencephalogram analysis
functional states
Reference: 
  1. Freeman WJ. W.G. Walter: The living brainю In: Palm G, Aertsen A, editors. Brain Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1986. P. 237–238. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70911-1_17.
  2. Fontanillo Lopez CA, Li G, Zhang D. Beyond technologies of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces: A systematic review from commercial and ethical aspects. Front. Neurosci. 2020;14:611130. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.611130.
  3. Craik A, He Y, Contreras-Vidal JL. Deep learning for electroencephalogram (EEG) classification tasks: a review. J. Neural Eng. 2019;16(3):031001. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0ab5.
  4. Douibi K, Le Bars S, Lemontey A, Nag L, Balp R, Breda G. Toward EEG-based BCI applications for industry 4.0: Challenges and possible applications. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021;15:705064. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.705064.
  5. Alimardani M, Hiraki K. Passive brain-computer interfaces for enhanced human-robot interaction. Front. Robot. AI. 2020;7:125. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00125.
  6. Batista A. Brain-computer interfaces for basic neuroscience. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2020;168:233–247. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63934-9.00017-2.
  7. Lotte F, Bougrain L, Cichocki A, Clerc M, Congedo M, Rakotomamonjy A, Yger F. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J. Neural Eng. 2018;15(3):031005. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2.
  8. Schwilden H. Concepts of EEG processing: from power spectrum to bispectrum, fractals, entropies and all that. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2006;20(1):31–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.09.001.
  9. Anokhin KV. The cognitome: Seeking the fundamental neuroscience of a theory of consciousness. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2021;51(7):915–937. DOI: 10.1007/s11055-021- 01149-4.
  10. Pobachenko SV, Kolesnik AG, Borodin AS, Kalyuzhin VV. The contingency of parameters of human encephalograms and Schumann resonance electromagnetic fields revealed in monitoring studies. Biophysics. 2006;51(3):480–483. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350906030225.
  11. Saroka KS, Vares DE, Persinger MA. Similar spectral power densities within the Schumann resonance and a large population of quantitative electroencephalographic profiles: Supportive evidence for Koenig and Pobachenko. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146595. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0146595.
  12. Ma Y, Shi W, Peng CK, Yang AC. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of sleep electroencephalography using fractal and entropy approaches. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2018;37:85–93. DOI: 10.1016/ j.smrv.2017.01.003.
  13. Lutz A, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99(3):1586–1591. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032658199.
  14. Kubryak O. The Anticipating heart. In: Nadin M, editor. Anticipation and Medicine. Cham: Springer; 2017. P. 49–65. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45142-8_4.
  15. Adelhofer N, Schreiter ML, Beste C. Cardiac cycle gated cognitive-emotional control in superior frontal cortices. NeuroImage. 2020;222:117275. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117275.
  16. Heck DH, Kozma R, Kay LM. The rhythm of memory: how breathing shapes memory function. J. Neurophysiol. 2019;122(2):563–571. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00200.2019.
  17. Aristov V, Stepanyan I. Hypothesis of cyclic structures of pre- and consciousness as a transition in neuron-like graphs to a special type of symmetry. Symmetry. 2022;14(3):505. DOI: 10.3390/ sym14030505.
  18. Stepanyan IV, Mekler AA. Chaotic algorithms of analysis of cardiovascular systems and artificial intelligence. In: Hu Z, Petoukhov S, He M, editors. Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education III. AIMEE 2019. Vol. 1126 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer; 2020. P. 231–240. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39162-1_21.
  19. Stepanyan IV, Lednev MY, Aristov VV. Genetic interpretation of neurosemantics and kinetic approach for studying complex nets: Theory and experiments. In: Hu Z, Petoukhov S, He M, editors. Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education IV. AIMEE 2020. Vol. 1315 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer; 2020. P. 13–28. DOI: 10.1007/ 978-3-030-67133-4_2.
  20. Iakovidou ND. Graph theory at the service of electroencephalograms. Brain Connect. 2017;7(3): 137–151. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2016.0426.
  21. Sporns O. Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2018;20(2):111–121. DOI: 10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.2/osporns.
Received: 
25.10.2022
Accepted: 
21.04.2023
Available online: 
12.07.2023
Published: 
31.07.2023
  • 986 reads