ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)

For citation:

Nuidel I. V., Kolosov A. V., Permiakov S. A., Egorov I. S., Polevaia S. A., Yakhno V. G. Mathematical model for controlling brain neuroplasticity during neurofeedback. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2024, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 472-491. DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-003109, EDN: CAAKSH

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon and_2024-4_nuidel_et-al_472-491.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Nonlinear Dynamics and Neuroscience
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
530.182
DOI: 
10.18500/0869-6632-003109
EDN: 
CAAKSH

Mathematical model for controlling brain neuroplasticity during neurofeedback

Autors: 
Nuidel Irina Vladimirovna, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Kolosov Alexey Vadimovich, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Permiakov Sergei Alexandrovich, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Egorov Igor S, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Polevaia Sofia Alexandrovna, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Yakhno Vladimir Grigorevich, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract: 

The purpose of this work is to apply a model of interaction between thalamocortical system modules to control brain neuroplasticity.

Methods. Psychophysiological experiments on neurofeedback are being carried out, which consist of light stimulation of the eyes with monofrequency light pulses in the range of 4...20 Hz and recording the bioelectrical activity of the brain. As a characteristic of maturity, brain rhythms use the combination of the presence or absence in the bioelectrical activity of the brain of a dominant peak frequency in the alpha range of the EEG, the effect of assimilation of the rhythms imposed by stimulation, and the presence of a multiplying effect from the rhythms imposed by stimulation. Solutions to the model of an elementary thalamocortical cell, which is described by a system of differential equations, corresponding to a psychophysiological experiment are considered. The model is implemented using the Python.

Results. The model parameters are selected in such a way as to achieve a qualitative correspondence of the spectral characteristics of the obtained solutions with the bioelectrical activity of the subject’s brain. Rhythmic maturity is assessed based on the parameters of the thalamocortical cell model. The brightness and frequency characteristics of light stimuli are selected based on the prediction of the model, the input of which is supplied with various variants of pulse sequences.

Conclusion. A method has been developed for digital diagnostics of the level of brain rhythm maturity based on a comparison of modeling results and data from a psychophysiological experiment on neurofeedback. The evolution of model solutions depending on its parameters simulates the process of biocontrol of brain neuroplasticity, taking into account the initial level of rhythmic maturity and stress-induced distortions of neurodynamics. Experiments on the model with different parameters of the model and external signal can be used in the development of new neurofeedback protocols.

Key words: 
thalamocortical cell model
neurofeedback
neuroplasticity
bioelectrical activity of the brain
assessment of brain rhythm maturity
Acknowledgments: 
The work on conducting psychophysiological experiments and data processing was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 22-18-20075, the modeling work was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-18-20075 and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in within the framework of the state assignment of the Institute of Applied Physics RAS, project No. FFUF-2021-0014
Reference: 
  1. Savchuk LV, Polevaya SA, Parin SB, Bondar AT, Fedotchev AI. Resonance scanning and analysis of the electroencephalogram in determining the maturity of cortical rhythms in younger schoolchildren. Biophysics. 2022;67(2)2:274. DOI: 10.1134/S000635092202018X.
  2. Shaw CA, McEachern JC. Toward a Theory of Neuroplasticity. New York: Psychology Press; 2001. 468 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203759790.
  3. Kaczmarek BL. Current views on neuroplasticity: what is new and what is old? Acta Neuropsychologica. 2020;18:1–14. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.8808.
  4. Kaczmarek B. L., Markiewicz K. Brain Plasticity and the Idea of the Functional System. Lurian Journal. 2021;2(2):46–62. DOI: 10.15826/Lurian.2021.2.2.3.
  5. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Gromov KN, Savchuk LV, Polevaya SA. Complex feedback from the biopotentials of the brain and heart in the correction of stress-induced states. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity named Pavlova. 2019;69(2):187–193 (in Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S00444 67719020059.
  6. Fedotchev AI. Human electroencephalogram-controlled effects of photostimulation. Biophysics. 2019;64(2):268-271. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350919020076.
  7. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA, Zemlianaia AA. Human body rhythms in the development of non-invasive methods of closed-loop adaptive neurostimulation. J. Pers. Med. 2021;11(5):437. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050437.
  8. Fedotchev AI, Zemlyannaya AA, Savchuk L, Polevaya SA. Neurointerface with double feedback from EEG in the correction of stress-induced disorders Modern technologies in medicine. 2019;11(1):150–154 (in Russian).DOI: 10.17691/stm2019.11.1.17.
  9. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA. Neurointerfaces controlled by biopotentials of the brain and heart in the correction of stress-induced disorders. RFBR Bulletin. Social and human sciences. 2019;94(1):144–152 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22204/2587-8956-2019-094-01-144-152.
  10. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA, Zemlyannaya AA. Effects of audio-visual stimulation automatically controlled by the biopotentials of the human brain and heart. Human Physiology. 2019;45(5):75–79 (in Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S0131164619050023.
  11. Coulter DA. Thalamocortical Anatomy and Physiology. In: Engel JrJ, Pedley TA, eds. Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. Philadelphia. Lippincott-Raven. 1997; 341–351.
  12. Miranda RA, Casebeer WD, Hein AM, Judy JW, Krotkov EP, Laabs TL, Manzo JE, Pankratz KZ, Pratt GA, Sanchez JC., Weber DJ, Wheeler TL, Ling GSF. Darpa-funded efforts in the development of novel brain-computer interface technologies. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2015;244:52–67). DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.019. 
  13. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA, Velikova SD. Brain-computer interface and neurofeedback technologies: Current state, problems and clinical prospects (Review). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2017;9(1):175–184. DOI: 10.17691/stm2017.9.1.22.
  14. Fedotchev AI, Oh Sang Jun, Bondar AT, Semenov VS. Modern Capabilities and Approaches to Enhancing Cognitive Activity and Learning Processes in Humans: Monograph. Pushchino: IBK RAS; 2017. 114 p. (in Russian).
  15. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA. Adaptive neurostimulation methods in correcting posttraumatic stress disorder and professional burnout syndrome. Opera Medica et Physiologica. 2021:8(2); 68–74. DOI: 10.24412/2500-2295-2021-2-68-74.
  16. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA, Zemlianaia AA EG-based musical neurointerfaces in the correction of stress-induced states. Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2022;9(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2021.1964874.
  17. Nuidel IV, Kolosov AV, Demareva VA, Yakhno VG. Using a phenomenological mathematical model to reproduce the interaction of endogenous and exogenous oscillations under neurocontrol. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2019;11(1):103–108 . DOI: 10.17691/stm2019.11.1.12.
  18. Fedotchev AI, Parin SB, Polevaya SA. Neurointerfaces based on endogenous rhythms of the body to optimize the functional state of a person and his cognitive rehabilitation. Advances in physiological sciences. 2021;52(2):83–92 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S030117982102003X.
  19. Zhang Y, Guo D, Xu P, Zhang Y, Yao D Robust frequency recognition for SSVEP-based BCI with temporally local multivariate synchronization index. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2016;10(1):505–511. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-016-9398-9.
  20. Kudryashov AV, Yakhno VG. Distribution of areas of increased impulse activity in a neural network. Dynamics of biological systems. 1978;2:45–59.
  21. Yakhno YG. Basic models of hierarchy neuron-like systems and ways to analyse some of their complex reactions. Optical Memory and Neural Network. 1995;4(2):145–155.
  22. Kolosov AV, Nuidel IV, Yakhno VG. Research of dynamic modes in the mathematical model of elementary thalamocortical cell. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics. 2016;24(5):72–83 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-2016-24-5-72-83.
Received: 
16.11.2023
Accepted: 
29.01.2024
Available online: 
22.05.2024
Published: 
31.07.2024
  • 918 reads