ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)


The article published as Early Access!

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
English
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
530.182
EDN: 

Using machine learning algorithms to determine the emotional maladjustment of a person by his rhythmogram

Autors: 
Stasenko Sergey Victorovich, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Shemagina Olga Vladimirovna, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Eremin Evgeny Viktorovich, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Yakhno Vladimir Grigorevich, Institute of Applied Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Parin Sergej Borisovich, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Polevaia Sofia Alexandrovna, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Abstract: 

The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of identifying emotional maladjustment using machine learning algorithms.

Methods. Electrocardiogram data were gathered using an event-telemetry approach, employing a software and hardware setup comprising a compact wireless ECG sensor (HxM; Zephyr Technology, USA) and a smartphone equipped with specialized software.For constructing the classifier, the following algorithms were employed: logistic regression, easy ensemble, and gradient boosting. The performance of these algorithms was assessed using the f1 metric.

Results. It is demonstrated that employing dynamic spectra of the original signals enhances the classification accuracy of the model compared to using the original rhythmograms.

Conclusion. A method is proposed for automatically determining the level of emotional maladaptation based on an individual’s cardiorhythmogram. Information from a portable heart sensor, worn by an individual, is transmitted via Bluetooth to a mobile device. Here, the level of emotional maladaptation is assessed through a pre-trained neural network algorithm. When considering a neural network algorithm, it is recommended to employ a classifier trained on spectrograms.

Acknowledgments: 
The work in terms of collecting and data preprocessing was supported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Education project number 075-15-2021-634, the work in term of data analisis was supported by the frames of the Governmental Project of the Institute of Applied Physics RAS, project No. FFUF-2021-0014, the work in terms of developing the conceptual scheme of the experiment was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project number 22-18-20075).
Reference: 
  1. Miskowiak KW, Johnsen S, Sattler SM, Nielsen S, Kunalan K, Rungby J, Lapperre T, Porsberg CM. Cognitive impairments four months after COVID-19 hospital discharge: Pattern, severity and association with illness variables. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46:39–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.019.
  2. Baig AM. Chronic COVID syndrome: Need for an appropriate medical terminology for long COVID and COVID long-haulers. J. Med. Virol. 2021;93(5):2555–2556. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26624.
  3. Yelin D, Wirtheim E, Vetter P, Kalil AC, Bruchfeld J, Runold M, Guaraldi G, Mussini C, Gudiol C, Pujol M, Bandera A, Scudeller L, Paul M, Kaiser L, Leibovici L. Long-term consequences of COVID-19: research needs. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(10):1115– 1117. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30701-5.
  4. Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global prevalence of postcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition or long COVID: A meta-analysis and systematic review. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2022;226(9):1593–1607. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac136.
  5. Alkodaymi MS, Omrani OA, Fawzy NA, Shaar BA, Almamlouk R, Riaz M, Obeidat M, Obeidat Y, Gerberi D, Taha RM, Kashour Z, Kashour T, Berbari EF, Alkattan K, Tleyjeh IM. Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2022;28(5):657–666. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.014.
  6. Stasenko SV, Kazantsev VB. Covid olfactory dysfunction model. In: 2023 Fifth International Conference Neurotechnologies and Neurointerfaces (CNN). IEEE; 2023. P. 82–85.
  7. Stasenko SV. Mean-field model of tripartite synapse with infected glial cells. In: 2023 Fifth International Conference Neurotechnologies and Neurointerfaces (CNN). IEEE; 2023. P. 78–81.
  8. Song M. Psychological stress responses to COVID-19 and adaptive strategies in China. World Development. 2020;136:105107. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105107.
  9. Stasenko SV, Hramov AE, Kazantsev VB. Loss of neuron network coherence induced by virusinfected astrocytes: a model study. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):6401. DOI: 10.1038/s41598- 023-33622-0.
  10. Stasenko SV, Kovalchuk AV, Eremin EV, Drugova OV, Zarechnova NV, Tsirkova MM, Permyakov SA, Parin SB, Polevaya SA. Using machine learning algorithms to determine the post-COVID state of a person by their rhythmogram. Sensors. 2023;23(11):5272. DOI: 10.3390/s23115272.
  11. Aleksandrovsky YA. Borderline Mental Races Construction. Moscow: Medicina; 2000. 496 p. (in Russian).
  12. Parfenov VA, Yakhno NN. General Neurology. Moscow: MIA; 2000. 209 p. (in Russian).
  13. Wise TN, Mann LS, Shay L. Alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 1992;33(3):147–151. DOI: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90023-j.
  14. Runova EV, Grigoreva VN, Bakhchina АV, Parin SB, Shishalov IS, Kozhevnikov VV, Nekrasova MM, Karatushina DI, Grigoreva KА, Polevaya SА. Vegetative correlates оf conscious representation оf emotional stress. Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2013;5(4):69–76.
  15. Grigorieva VN, Tkhostov AS. A method for assessing emotional new human condition. Patent No. 2291720.2007 Russian Federation, IPC A61M21/00: appl. 08.09.2005: publ. 20.01.2007. Assignee: Nizhny Novgorod State Medical Academy of the Federal Agency for Health and Social Development. 23 p. (in Russian).
  16. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, Chichester: Wiley; 2002. 392 p. DOI: 10.1002/0471722146.
  17. Liu X-Y, Wu J, Zhou Z-H. Exploratory undersampling for class-imbalance learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). 2009;39(2):539–550. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2007853.
  18. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. Boosting and additive trees. In: The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer; 2009. P. 337–387. DOI: 10.1007/978- 0-387-84858-7_10.
  19. Schapire RE. Explaining AdaBoost. In: Scholkopf B, Luo Z, Vovk V, editors. Empirical Inference. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. P. 37–52. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41136-6_5.
  20. Kramer O. Scikit-learn. In: Machine Learning for Evolution Strategies. Vol. 20 of Studies in Big Data. Cham: Springer; 2016. P. 45–53. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33383-0_5.
  21. Lemaitre G, Nogueira F, Aridas CK. Imbalanced-learn: A python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2017; 18(1):1–5.
Received: 
10.10.2023
Accepted: 
08.11.2023
Available online: 
15.03.2024