ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)


Cite this article as:

Kornilov M. V., Sysoev I. V. Investigating nonlinear granger causality method efficiency at strong synchronization of systems. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-2014-22-4-66-76

Language: 
Russian

Investigating nonlinear granger causality method efficiency at strong synchronization of systems

Autors: 
Kornilov Maksim Vyacheslavovich, Saratov State University
Sysoev Ilya V., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Detecting the direction of coupling between systems using records of their oscillations is an actual task for many areas of knowledge. Its solution can hardly be achieved in case of synchronization. Granger causality method is promising for this task, since it allows to hope for success in the case of partial (e.g., phase) synchronization due to considering not only phases but also amplitudes of both signals. In this paper using the etalon test systems with pronounced time scale the method of nonlinear Granger causality was shown to be effective even in the case of strong phase-locking, with phase synchronization index up to 0.95. Obtained results were tested for significance by various methods based on surrogates times series generation, which showed similar estimates.

DOI: 
10.18500/0869-6632-2014-22-4-66-76
References: 

1. Baccala L.A., Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination // Biol. Cybern. 2001. Vol. 84. P. 463. 2. Schreiber T. Measuring Information Transfer // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000. Vol. 85. P. 461. 3. Rosenblum M., and Pikovsky A. Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators // Phys. Rev. E. 2001. Vol. 64. 045202(R) 4. Smirnov D. and Bezruchko B. Estimation of interaction strength and direction from short and noisy time series // Phys. Rev. E. 2003. Vol. 68. 046209. 5. Granger C.W.J. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods // Econometrica. 1969. Vol. 37, No 3. P. 424. 6. Baccala L.A., Sameshima K., Ballester G., Do Valle A.C., and Timo-Laria C. Studing the interactions between brain structures via directed coherence and Granger causality // Applied sig. processing. 1998. Vol. 5. P. 40. 7. Gourevitch B., Le Bouquin-Jeannes R., Faucon G. Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications // Biological Cybernetics. 2006. Vol.95. P.349. 8. Tass P., Smirnov D., Karavaev A., Barnikol U., Barnikol T., Adamchic I., Hauptmann C., Pawelcyzk N., Maarouf M., Sturm V., Freund H.-J., and Bezruchko B. The causal relationship between subcortical local field potential oscillations and Parkinsonian resting tremor // J. Neural Eng. 2010. Vol. 7. 016009. 9. Мохов И.И., Смирнов Д.А. Эмпирические оценки воздействия различных факторов на глобальную приповерхностную температуру // Доклады академии наук. 2009. Т. 426. С. 679. 10. Корнилов М.В., Сысоев И.В. Влияние выбора структуры модели на работоспособность метода нелинейной причинности по Грейнджеру // Изв. вузов. Прикладная нелинейная динамика. 2013. Т. 21, No 2. С. 3. 11. Allefeld C., Kurths J. Testing for phase synchronization // Int. J. Bif. Chaos. 2004. Vol. 14. С. 405. 12. Packard N., Crutchfield J., Farmer J. and Shaw R. Geometry from a time series // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980. Vol. 45. P. 712. 13. Kougioumtzis D. State space reconstruction parameters in the analysis of chaotic time series – the role of the time window length // Physica D. 1996. Vol. 95(1). P. 13. 14. Rossler O.E.  ? An equation for continuous chaos // Phys. Lett. 1976. Vol. A57, No 5.P. 397. 15. Кияшко С.В., Пиковский А.С., Рабинович М.И. Автогенератор радиодиапазона со стохастическим поведением // Радиотехника и электроника. 1980. Т. 25, No 2. С. 336. 16. Корнилов М.В., Голова Т.М., Сысоев И.В. Подбор временных масштабов прогностической модели, используемой для оценки связанности методом нелинейной причинности по Грейнджеру // Тезисы докладов VIII Всероссийской конференции молодых учёных «Наноэлектроника, нанофотоника и нелинейная физика». 3–5 сентября Саратов 2013 г. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та. 2013. С. 128. 17. Schreiber T., and Schmitz A. Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. Vol. 77. P. 635. 18. Dolan K.T., Neiman A. Surrogate analysis of coherent multichannel data // Physical Review. E. 2002. Vol. 65. 026108. 19. Thiel M., Romano M. C., Kurths J., Rolfs M., and Kliegl R. Twin surrogates to test for complex synchronisation // Europhys. Lett. 2006. Vol. 75(4). P. 535

Short text (in English):