ISSN 0869-6632 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1905 (Online)


For citation:

Tsybulin V. G., Ha T. D., Zelenchuk P. A. Nonlinear dynamics of the predator – prey system in a heterogeneous habitat and scenarios of local interaction of species. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, vol. 29, iss. 5, pp. 751-764. DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-2021-29-5-751-764

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 246)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
530.182

Nonlinear dynamics of the predator – prey system in a heterogeneous habitat and scenarios of local interaction of species

Autors: 
Tsybulin Vyacheslav Georgievich, Southern Federal University
Ha Toan Dang, Southern Federal University
Zelenchuk Pavel Anatolyevich, Southern Federal University
Abstract: 

The purpose of this work is to study the influence of various local models in the equations of diffusion–advection– reaction on the spatial processes of coexistence of predators and prey under conditions of a nonuniform distribution of the carrying capacity. We consider a system of nonlinear parabolic equations to describe diffusion, taxis, and local interaction of a predator and prey in a one-dimensional habitat. Methods. We carried out the study of the system using the dynamical systems approach and a computational experiment based on the method of lines and a scheme of staggered grids. Results. The behavior of the predator – prey system has been studied for various scenarios of local interaction, taking into account the hyperbolic law of prey growth and the Holling effect with nonuniform carrying capacity. We have established paradoxical scenarios of interaction between prey and predator for several modifications of the trophic function. Stationary and nonstationary solutions are analyzed considering diffusion and directed migration of species. Conclusion. The trophic function that considers the heterogeneity of the resource is proposed, which does not lead to paradoxical dynamics.

Acknowledgments: 
This work was supported by a grant from the Goverment of the Russian Federation No. 075-15-2019-1928
Reference: 
  1. Murray JD. Mathematical Biology II: Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003. 814 p. DOI: 10.1007/b98869.
  2. Turchin PB. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis (MPB-35). Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003. 472 p.
  3. Bazykin AD. Nonlinear Dynamics of Interacting Populations. Singapore: World Scientific; 1998. 216 p. DOI: 10.1142/2284.
  4. Rubin A, Riznichenko G. Mathematical Biophysics. New York: Springer; 2014. 273 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8702-9.
  5. Cantrell RS, Cosner C. Spatial Ecology Via Reaction-Diffusion Equations. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2003. 428 p. DOI: 10.1002/0470871296.
  6. Malchow H, Petrovskii SV, Venturino E. Spatiotemporal Patterns in Ecology and Epidemiology: Theory, Models, and Simulation. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008. 469 p.
  7. Frisman YY, Kulakov MP, Revutskaya OL, Zhdanova OL, Neverova GP. The key approaches and review of current researches on dynamics of structured and interacting populations. Computer Research and Modeling. 2019;11(1):119–151 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2019-11-1-119-151.
  8. Kim K, Choi W. Local dynamics and coexistence of predator-prey model with directional dispersal of predator. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2020;17(6):6737–6755. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2020351.
  9. Courchamp F, Berec J, Gascoigne J. Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. 256 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570301.001.0001.
  10. Svirezhev YM. Nonlinear Waves, Dissipative Patterns and Catastrophes in Ecology. Moscow: Nauka; 1987. 368 p. (in Russian).
  11. Tyutyunov YV, Titova LI. From Lotka–Volterra to Arditi–Ginzburg: 90 years of evolving trophic functions. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2020;10(3):167–185. DOI: 10.1134/S207908642003007X.
  12. Epifanov AV, Tsybulin VG. Modeling of oscillatory scenarios of the coexistence of competing populations. Biophysics. 2016;61(4):696–704. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350916040072.
  13. Epifanov AV, Tsybulin VG. Regarding the dynamics of cosymmetric predator – prey systems. Computer Research and Modeling. 2017;9(5):799–813 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2017-9-5-799-813.
  14. Holling CS. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist. 1959;91(7):385–398. DOI: 10.4039/Ent91385-7.
  15. Budyansky AV, Frischmuth K, Tsybulin VG. Cosymmetry approach and mathematical modeling of species coexistence in a heterogeneous habitat. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems – B. 2019;24(2):547–561. DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018196.
  16. Budyansky AV, Tsybulin VG. Modeling of multifactor taxis in a predator–prey system. Biophysics. 2019;64(2):256–260. DOI: 10.1134/S0006350919020040.
  17. Abrams PA. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000;31(1):79–105. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79.
  18. Zagrebneva AD, Govorukhin VN, Surkov FA. Bifurcations in active predator – passive prey model. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics. 2014;22(3):94–106 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18500/0869-6632-2014-22-3-94-106.
  19. Tyutyunov YV, Titova LI, Senina IN. Prey-taxis destabilizes homogeneous stationary state in spatial Gause–Kolmogorov-type model for predator–prey system. Ecological Complexity. 2017; 31:170–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2017.07.001.
  20. Mishra P, Wrzosek D. The role of indirect prey-taxis and interference among predators in pattern formation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2020;43(18):10441–10461. DOI: 10.1002/mma.6426.
  21. Haskell EC, Bell J. Pattern formation in a predator-mediated coexistence model with prey-taxis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems – B. 2020;25(8):2895–2921. DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020045.
Received: 
12.01.2021
Accepted: 
15.04.2021
Published: 
30.09.2021